Discussion:
Hi
(too old to reply)
JJNova Chuklz
2014-08-02 15:00:39 UTC
Permalink
Are there any humans that still visit this group?
Evgenii Sputnik
2014-08-05 04:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by JJNova Chuklz
Are there any humans that still visit this group?
Maybe.
--
Evgenii Sputnik
greenaum
2014-09-03 01:53:22 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:55:17 +0700, Evgenii Sputnik
Post by Evgenii Sputnik
Post by JJNova Chuklz
Are there any humans that still visit this group?
Maybe.
We're all waiting for someone to start a conversation. Any time, now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

"hey let's educate the brutes, we know we are superior to them anyway,
just through genetics, we are gentically superior to the working
class. They are a shaved monkey. If we educate them, they will be able
to read instructions, turn up on time and man the conveyor belts,
sorted." #
JJNova Chuklz
2014-09-26 14:01:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by greenaum
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:55:17 +0700, Evgenii Sputnik
Post by Evgenii Sputnik
Post by JJNova Chuklz
Are there any humans that still visit this group?
Maybe.
We're all waiting for someone to start a conversation. Any time, now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
It's been a while, what would someone consider "classic" video games now?
Can the NES now be discussed? :)
jt august
2014-12-08 06:56:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by JJNova Chuklz
It's been a while, what would someone consider "classic" video games now?
Can the NES now be discussed? :)
That debate was discussed back in the 90's. The ultimate concensus was
yes. It became commonly regarded as the neo-classic era, including the
SMS, Genny, SNES, TG-16 and NeoGeo. The NexGen classics later
incorporated the Jaguar, Saturn, psx, n64 and DC. the lst proposed
grouping was never fully agreed on as to dubbing, I recall names like
post-nexgen and millenial classics, but this was the ps2 and xb
grouping. Some proposed keeping it in the nexgen classic, because there
was a magazine in their era called nexgen.

From there, things have fizzled out as far as r.g.v.c is concerned.

jt
Mike Knapp
2015-01-18 04:58:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by jt august
Post by JJNova Chuklz
It's been a while, what would someone consider "classic" video games now?
Can the NES now be discussed? :)
That debate was discussed back in the 90's. The ultimate concensus was
yes. It became commonly regarded as the neo-classic era, including the
SMS, Genny, SNES, TG-16 and NeoGeo. The NexGen classics later
incorporated the Jaguar, Saturn, psx, n64 and DC. the lst proposed
grouping was never fully agreed on as to dubbing, I recall names like
post-nexgen and millenial classics, but this was the ps2 and xb
grouping. Some proposed keeping it in the nexgen classic, because there
was a magazine in their era called nexgen.
From there, things have fizzled out as far as r.g.v.c is concerned.
jt
So it sounds like yes, the NES can be discussed. Let's do it!

I was originally an Atari guy, and really didn't want to like the NES, but in the end I did. Spent a lot of time with Duck Hunt, Super Mario Bros 2, RC Pro AM, Zelda, and Defender.

I have to idea what became of my NES. Still have my 2600. ;-)

Mike
Cyber kNight
2015-05-11 20:06:17 UTC
Permalink
I also had an Atari 2600 first but I didn't get it unti
Christmas 1983. I didn't get the NES until it had been ou
several years either (1989 or 1990 I think). The first vide
game system I really remember looking forward to was th
Super Nintendo but my favorite system for playing games wil
always be my Commodore 64. I still have all of these system
(though the Atari 2600 is a different one...I got rid o
mine after getting a Commodore 64 Christmas 1987 but picke
one up again a few years later...). Unfortunately I don'
have much time to play any of them. The Commodore 64 is th
only classic system I have set up currently
--
http://www.megalextoria.com:1975

--
--> http://www.megalextoria.com/forum2 <--

Loading...